Skip to main content

The Man The Allies Ignored

The Polish volunteer who infiltrated Auschwitz.
Roger Moorhouse | Published in History Today Volume 69 Issue 8 August 2019
AuschwitzAuschwitz
If historical reputations were based on merit, Witold Pilecki would be a household name. Yet, the Polish Army captain who volunteered to be sent to Auschwitz in 1940, to report on the Germans’ nefarious activities in the camp, is little known outside Poland.
This state of affairs should change with the publication of Jack Fairweather’s The Volunteer. Fairweather, a journalist, has produced a lively and engaging biography of Pilecki, which draws heavily on contemporary accounts left by the subject himself.
Pilecki’s story is certainly remarkable. In the autumn of 1940, he volunteered to be captured by the Germans in Warsaw, in the expectation that he would be sent to the new concentration camp at Auschwitz, from where he would report back to the Polish underground. At Auschwitz he witnessed the beginning of a genocide; a place so brutally run that thousands of Polish prisoners were dying of disease, maltreatment and overwork every month.
True to his remit, Pilecki began compiling information, which he periodically smuggled out of the camp in a series of reports. His expectation was that the Polish underground and Allied governments would be moved to action, but he was to be disappointed. As Fairweather explains, Pilecki would be perennially dismayed by the unwillingness of Poland’s allies to bomb Auschwitz. For their part, British politicians and senior RAF commanders complained that targeting the camp would be a distraction from the war effort and that they could scarcely avoid casualties among the inmates. Pilecki was unmoved. Such were the conditions in the camp, he wrote, that even if prisoners were to die in the attack, ‘it would be a relief’.
Frustrated by his inability to hinder the Germans’ genocidal intentions, Pilecki escaped from Auschwitz in 1943, after a moonlight dash from a bakery on the camp’s perimeter. Finding his way back to the Polish underground, he then fought in the Warsaw Rising of the following year, ending the war in a German POW camp in Bavaria.
From there he returned to Poland, in the full knowledge that his work for the underground would mean he would be targeted by the communists. He was duly arrested in 1947 on trumped-up charges of espionage and plotting assassinations. Tried and found guilty, he was executed the following year, disappearing from public memory until his rehabilitation following the fall of communism in 1989.
Pilecki’s life – which is an object lesson in the murderous brutality of Europe’s twin totalitarian systems – is ripe for the telling and Fairweather tells it very well. Though his story concentrates primarily on Pilecki’s experiences in the camp, his narrative is nonetheless full of vignettes and deftly drawn characters: from the hated Kapos (barrack leaders) to the countless unfortunates who shared his fate.
Aside from the remarkable story of its subject, Fairweather’s book is also a compelling and human account of the development of Auschwitz from a concentration camp primarily for Poles, to the centrepiece of the German plan to exterminate Europe’s Jews. Pilecki was under no illusions about that hideous evolution. His tragedy was that he was unable to convince the outside world to respond accordingly.
The story of Witold Pilecki has long been crying out for a sensitive, circumspect retelling, which would do justice to the man and to the trying times in which he lived. The Volunteer fulfils those criteria admirably.
The Volunteer: The True Story of the Resistance Hero who Infiltrated Auschwitz
Jack Fairweather
WH Allen
537pp £20

Popular posts from this blog

Cholera in Victorian London

  In 1831 a terrifying new epidemic arrived in London, bringing with it fear and panic⁠—and a sense of urgency about the city's sanitation problems. In the 1700s, Great Britain began transforming into an industrialised nation. By the 1800s, London was the largest city in the world as a result of the social changes brought about by industrialisation, such as mass migration from the countryside to the town.  But London was a city overwhelmed by the waste products of its ever-growing population, the majority of whom lived in the squalor of overcrowded slums. Human waste piled up in courtyards and overflowed from basement cesspits into the gutters and waterways. Wellcome Collection (CC BY) Image source for Illustration of London slum with subtitle 'A court for King Cholera' In such conditions diseases were inevitable. Outbreaks of diseases such as typhoid and scarlet fever were common, but the arrival of cholera led to new investigation into sanitation and
Read more

Ernest Renan, “What is a Nation?”, text of a conference delivered at the Sorbonne on March 11th, 1882, in Ernest Renan, Qu’est-ce qu’une nation?, Paris, Presses-Pocket, 1992. (translated by Ethan Rundell)

 I propose to analyze with you an idea which, though apparently clear, lends itself to the most dangerous misunderstandings. The forms of human society are of the greatest variety. They include great agglomerations of men after the fashion of China, Egypt, and ancient Babylonia; tribes such as the Hebrews and the Arabs; city-states on the Athenian and Spartan model; reunions of diverse countries such as were to be found under the Carolingian Empire; communities such as the Israelites and the parsis, lacking a country and maintained by religious bonds; nations like France, England, and most other modern, autonomous polities; confederations after the fashion of Switzerland and America; the great families that race, or rather language, has established between the different branches of Germans, the different branches of Slavs. Such are the types of groupings that exist, or rather existed, and that one confuses only at the price of the most serious inconvenience. At the time of the Fre
Read more

12 things you (probably) didn’t know about the Wars of the Roses

The Wars of the Roses were the civil wars fought in England and Wales between the Yorkist and Lancastrian dynasties between 1455 and 1485. Though historians can’t agree on precisely when and where the conflicts concluded, the general consensus is that the Wars of the Roses ended with the battle of Bosworth in 1485, when Henry Tudor (the future Henry VII, the first Tudor king) defeated and killed Richard III... But, argues historian Matthew Lewis, the roots of these dynastic civil wars went deeper and the branches reached further than this 30-year timeframe suggests. Here, writing for  History Extra , Lewis shares 12 lesser-known facts about the Wars of the Roses… 1 Jack Cade’s rebellion rocked the Lancastrians In July 1450, a mysterious man known as Jack Cade led a huge force of common men from Kent into London to protest against the ailing government of  the Lancastrian king Henry VI.  This episode is generally regarded as being outside the bounds of the Wars of the Roses
Read more